Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
21cfrpart11 · A forum for issues and questions regardi
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Show off your group to the world. Share a photo of your group with us.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Messages 18460 - 18489 of 18489   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Messages: Simplify | Expand   (Group by Topic) Author Sort by Date ^
18460
Ok let me clarify...the data used from these systems is used in regulatory submissions (GLP data), and the system stores electronic records. So Part 11...
akasharya74
Offline Send Email
Jul 17, 2008
1:33 pm
18461
The Audit Trail requirement is applicable to the modifications of records required by the regulation.  The other process of locking/unlocking records by...
Orlando Lopez
olopez6102
Offline Send Email
Jul 17, 2008
1:33 pm
18462
Dear slammed, What do you mean by "unlocked"? If the original record still has an unimpeachable, irrefutable, computer-enforced association between it and the...
Thomas Quinn
tocuin
Offline Send Email
Jul 17, 2008
1:33 pm
18463
You are totally correct.  It is a good practice to have controls on equipment.  Even for research applications, equipment must be controlled.  On those...
Orlando Lopez
olopez6102
Offline Send Email
Jul 17, 2008
1:33 pm
18464
This is not about Part 11 or GAMP.  It is about the practice of tracing data to an equipment level.  Usually this is relevant during investigations and/or...
Orlando Lopez
olopez6102
Offline Send Email
Jul 17, 2008
1:34 pm
18465
Part 11 is applicable, because this is data for submission and is managed electronically. Not because this data is stored electronically. You have the option...
olopez6102@...
olopez6102
Offline Send Email
Jul 17, 2008
2:32 pm
18466
I would say that no, I don't think you can get away with that. I'm basing that on the fact that in a corollary situation when dealing with QA and Regulatory...
Vincent S. Venturella
maiui5
Offline Send Email
Jul 17, 2008
2:32 pm
18467
akasharya74 From 21 CFR PART 58--GOOD LABORATORY PRACTICE FOR NONCLINICAL LABORATORY STUDIES ... § 58.63 Maintenance and calibration of equipment. ... (c)...
Thomas Quinn
tocuin
Offline Send Email
Jul 17, 2008
2:59 pm
18468
Thanks everyone! I was wondering if I could use 58.63 to convey my point across to the group, and I think I will! Unfortunately I'm getting push back because...
akasharya74
Offline Send Email
Jul 17, 2008
3:36 pm
18469
... managed electronically. Not because this data is stored electronically. You have the option of print reports, sign these reports, and submit the reports...
paul.labas
Offline Send Email
Jul 17, 2008
4:44 pm
18470
Hello all. Im in the process of having to create a new position within a CRO's IT dept called "IT compliance officer" This person's job description would be to...
Daniel
kdb01
Offline Send Email
Jul 17, 2008
8:06 pm
18471
If this person is reporting into IT isn't there a conflict of interest. The fox guarding the henhouse sort of thing? ________________________________ From:...
Greene, Brian
brian.greene@...
Send Email
Jul 18, 2008
3:54 pm
18472
Hello, I was somewhat critisized for not showing a statistically significant sample size for running through a LIMS PQ. By sample size, I mean number of...
smeltbass
Offline Send Email
Jul 18, 2008
3:54 pm
18473
Once signed, that record must not be changed. The way to do it is to create a new record with the changes and sign it with the new one becoming the official...
jgrobertson2003
Offline Send Email
Jul 18, 2008
3:54 pm
18474
Is the concern a system load issue (didn't stress the system) or didn't exercise all the functions? Did you not have any boundary values? I usually you do...
Greg Mendizabal
mendi
Offline Send Email
Jul 18, 2008
4:35 pm
18475
Based on the brief job description, it would not be a conflict of interest. From the description, they are responsible for writing SOPs and other tasks to...
tfieser
Offline Send Email
Jul 18, 2008
4:35 pm
18476
As to training and experience, they should have a background in IT security, IT audit, and, preferably, Quality Assurance, with knowledge of the regulations...
tfieser
Offline Send Email
Jul 18, 2008
4:40 pm
18477
I would look for ITIL (Information Technology Information Library) and COBIT (Control Objectives for Information and related Technology) training and...
Jennifer Carr
jcarrmcse
Offline Send Email
Jul 18, 2008
5:34 pm
18478
Hi Greg, All functional testing and boundary testing done in OQ. The initial concern was that the PQ period was not long enough to excersize 'enough'...
smeltbass
Offline Send Email
Jul 18, 2008
7:18 pm
18479
For a simple document-record, that approach works fine. What happens when the document-record is comprised of data that spans multiple tables, table-records,...
Martin G. Knop
mjknop
Online Now Send Email
Jul 18, 2008
8:16 pm
18480
So if you've done all the functionality testing in the OQ, and the PQ isn't being used to assess performance concerns (like performance under max network/user...
akasharya74
Offline Send Email
Jul 18, 2008
8:17 pm
18481
Similar to the process validation, a computer systems PQ test all the functionality together, not individual functionality.  Another difference between the...
Orlando Lopez
olopez6102
Offline Send Email
Jul 18, 2008
8:33 pm
18482
Read my email about this subject sent few seconds ago. Yes, I work in that level of detail if the computer systems PQ will also be used as the Process...
Orlando Lopez
olopez6102
Offline Send Email
Jul 18, 2008
8:40 pm
18483
The difference between "process validation" when you're talking about a manufacturing process with many mechanical parts and a computer validation where people...
Greg Mendizabal
mendi
Offline Send Email
Jul 18, 2008
10:30 pm
18484
" Another difference between the computer systems OQ and PQ: PQ is performed by the user(s); and, for those systems with test environment and production...
akasharya74
Offline Send Email
Jul 18, 2008
10:30 pm
18485
It is not based in interpretation. You should read the process validation guideline and apply this guideline based on computer systems FDA CPG 7132a.11. ...
olopez6102@...
olopez6102
Offline Send Email
Jul 18, 2008
11:39 pm
18486
Where in there does it say that software PQ is done in a production environment by the end-user? I'm going off of the FDA's final guidance on General...
akasharya74
Offline Send Email
Jul 19, 2008
4:21 pm
18487
DB: I commend you for asking the question BEFORE hiring someone. This is a place where a lot of pharmaceutical companies go astray. Often there is an attempt...
jgrobertson2003
Offline Send Email
Jul 19, 2008
4:21 pm
18488
A medical device guideline!!! It seams that you are jumping all over the place. Ok. You are absolutelly correct. Cheers, Orlando Lopez Sent via BlackBerry by...
olopez6102@...
olopez6102
Offline Send Email
Jul 19, 2008
6:17 pm
18489
"In addition to an evaluation of the system's ability to properly perform its intended functions, there should be an evaluation of the ability of the users of...
Orlando Lopez
olopez6102
Offline Send Email
Jul 19, 2008
6:17 pm
Messages 18460 - 18489 of 18489   Oldest  |  < Older  |  Newer >  |  Newest
Advanced
Add to My Yahoo!      XML What's This?

Copyright © 2007 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help