Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
agile-testing · Agile Software Testing
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want your group to be featured on the Yahoo! Groups website? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
Re: Digest Number 2439   Message List  
Reply | Forward Message #18022 of 18165 |
Re: Digest Number 2439

--- In agile-testing@yahoogroups.com, "Hagar, Jon D" <jon.d.hagar@...> wrote:
>
> ... Lisa is right. I have worked at places that were
> both some flavor of Agile and CMMI level 3 (independently
> assessed).
>

The CMMI is a bunch of words. Of course you can 'do' it, for some definition of
'do'. You might have to in order to win a contract. I'm saying as a process
improvement framework, it's an oxymoron.

I grant that you /can/ get /some/ value out of /some/ aspects of the CMMI. I
would add that if you're advanced enough to be able to pull this value out, you
don't need the models: Just read Jerry Weinberg's Quality Software Management:
Volume I and get to it.


--heusser




Fri Oct 30, 2009 1:59 pm

heusserm
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
Message #18022 of 18165 |
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Lisa wrote: Google Mark Paulk, he has written in the past about Agile (or XP) and CMMI. There's nothing incompatible between agile and any of the quality...
Hagar, Jon D
jondhagar
Offline Send Email
Oct 30, 2009
1:30 pm

... The CMMI is a bunch of words. Of course you can 'do' it, for some definition of 'do'. You might have to in order to win a contract. I'm saying as a...
Matthew
heusserm
Offline Send Email
Oct 30, 2009
1:59 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help