Search the web
Sign In
New User? Sign Up
junit · JUnit, the Java unit testing framework written by Kent Beck and Erich Gamma.
? Already a member? Sign in to Yahoo!

Yahoo! Groups Tips

Did you know...
Want to share photos of your group with the world? Add a group photo to Flickr.

Best of Y! Groups

   Check them out and nominate your group.
Having problems with message search? Fill out this form to ensure your group is one of the first to be migrated to the new message search system.

Messages

  Messages Help
Advanced
UnExplained Behavior Executing Parameteric Tests with JUnit 4.6   Topic List   < Prev Topic  |  Next Topic >
Reply | Forward  |  Next Message > 
Re: [junit] UnExplained Behavior Executing Parameteric Tests with JUnit 4.6

It seems like this is intended. The documentation here:
http://junit.org/apidocs/org/junit/runners/Parameterized.html
When running a parameterized test class, instances are created for the
cross-product of the test methods and the test data elements.

If you think about it, how would junit figure out which are your instances
that require the parameters? I mean theres no way to figure out based on the
testThree method that this is the one that should be run with different
parameters.

Seems allright to me.

On Fri, Jul 3, 2009 at 15:27, kartik_krishnanand <
kartik_krishnanand@...> wrote:

>
>
> Hi,
>
> I tried to generate parameteric tests with JUnit 4.6. I don't know if this
> is an expected behavior.
>
> Test Code
>
> @RunWith(Parameterized.class)
> public class JUnit4Test {
>
> private String name;
>
> @BeforeClass
> public static void setUpOnceBeforeClass() throws Exception {
> System.out.println("Before Class");
> }
>
> @Before
> public void setUp() throws Exception {
> System.out.println("Before Method");
> }
>
> @After
> public void tearDown() throws Exception {
> System.out.println("After Method");
> }
>
> @AfterClass
> public static void tearDownOnceAfterClass() throws Exception {
> System.out.println("After Class");
> }
>
> @Test()
> public void testOne() throws Exception {
> System.out.println("One");
> }
>
> @Test
> public void testTwo() throws Exception {
> System.out.println("Two");
> }
>
> @Test
> public void testThree() throws Exception {
> System.out.println(this.name);
> }
>
> public JUnit4Test(String name) {
> this.name = name;
> }
>
> @Parameters
> public static Collection<Object[]> getNames() {
> return Arrays.asList(new Object[][] {
> {"Kartik"}, {"Rakesh"}, {"Ed"}
> });
> }
> }
>
> My output
>
> Before Class
> Before Method
> One
> After Method
> Before Method
> Two
> After Method
>
> Before Method
> Kartik
> After Method
> Before Method
> One
> After Method
> Before Method
> Two
> After Method
> Before Method
> Rakesh
> After Method
> Before Method
> One
> After Method
> Before Method
> Two
> After Method
> Before Method
> Ed
> After Method
> After Class
>
> It runs the unit tests three times. The testOne, testTwo outputs remain
> unchanged, the testThree output changes with the depending upon the name.
>
> Is this the expected behavior? I expected that testThree would run three
> times each with a different parameter. Does anyone know if there is a reason
> for this implementation.
>
>
>



--
Regards,
Puneet


[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]




Sat Jul 4, 2009 2:20 am

mnferrari2000
Offline Offline
Send Email Send Email

Forward
 |  Next Message > 
Expand Messages Author Sort by Date

Hi, I tried to generate parameteric tests with JUnit 4.6. I don't know if this is an expected behavior. Test Code @RunWith(Parameterized.class) public class...
kartik_krishnanand
kartik_krish...
Offline Send Email
Jul 4, 2009
1:12 am

I've modified the program by adding a counting variable that is scoped to the class. You can play arround with why this is important on your own time... but...
Mike Forsberg
bigmike_f
Offline Send Email
Jul 4, 2009
1:07 pm

It seems like this is intended. The documentation here: http://junit.org/apidocs/org/junit/runners/Parameterized.html When running a parameterized test class,...
Puneet Lakhina
mnferrari2000
Offline Send Email
Jul 4, 2009
1:07 pm
Advanced

Copyright © 2009 Yahoo! Inc. All rights reserved.
Privacy Policy - Terms of Service - Guidelines - Help